DSpace Repository

Performance Evaluation Tool for Radiologic Technology Interns of Lorma Colleges

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Carl Cheevey A. Ablin
dc.contributor.author Trina Amor A. Colisao
dc.contributor.author Ashley Marie L. Daigdigan
dc.contributor.author Ethan Drahcir B. Equilla
dc.contributor.author Herley Keith A. Esperon
dc.contributor.author Frances Gisella R. Lunor
dc.contributor.author Daphne Cate G. Navarro
dc.date.accessioned 2026-07-09T08:00:24Z
dc.date.available 2026-07-09T08:00:24Z
dc.date.issued 2025-06-19
dc.identifier.issn 2094-4160
dc.identifier.uri https://research.lorma.edu/xmlui/handle/123456789/370
dc.description.abstract Radiologic Technology Internships are vital for developing clinical competence. However, the lack of standardization in performance evaluation tool poses a challenge to the accuracy, reliability, and fairness of assessing the Radiologic Technology intern’s clinical competencies. This study describes the development and implementation of a performance evaluation tool to assess the clinical competencies of Radiologic Technology interns at Lorma Colleges, aligned with the program outcomes outlined in CHED Memorandum Order No. 7, Series of 2018. Utilizing a descriptive-comparative approach, the study compared self-assessments from 48 interns with evaluations from 3 clinical instructors and 30 hospital affiliation staff to identify strengths and areas for improvement. Results showed that interns were rated from “Highly Proficient” to “Outstanding” across all areas, with the highest scores in ethical practice (4.91), nationalism (4.86), and patient care (4.82). Lower scores were noted in academic research and lifelong learning. Statistical analysis revealed significant differences in ratings among evaluator groups in seven out of eight areas (p < 0.05), yet overall performance remained at or above the expected competency level. These result validates the evaluation tool’s applicability in assessing intern’s performance and confirm its alignment with CHED’s program outcomes. It is therefore recommended that the evaluation tool continue to be used, with enhancements focused on leadership, research engagement, and lifelong learning to ensure the holistic development of future radiologic technologists in line with both professional standards and evolving demands of healthcare. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher Lorma Colleges en_US
dc.subject clinical performance en_US
dc.subject clinical skills en_US
dc.subject Internship en_US
dc.subject evaluation en_US
dc.subject performance evaluation en_US
dc.subject Radiologic Technologist en_US
dc.title Performance Evaluation Tool for Radiologic Technology Interns of Lorma Colleges en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account